Folks, do you think that online privacy really exists?
This is what we tried to find out when we surveyed 1,007 Americans. Rad Campaign, Lincoln Parks Strategy, and I teamed up to uncover experiences and views about online privacy. We took the results and created an infographic to share with you.
This is the second portion of data from the poll to be released. Last month, we released an infographic showing that about half of Americans under 35 have been bullied, harassed, or threatened online, or know someone who has.
Here’s a snapshot of what the Online Privacy survey revealed:
74 % of Americans are either very or somewhat concerned about having too much personal information about them online.
On average, those surveyed believe that 64% of Americans have too much personal information about themselves online.
People under 35 have more trust in social media sites than any other age demographic.
70% are certain or think it’s very likely that social networks collect personal data such as interests, political affiliation, purchase habits, and what content is clicked, and then sell that data to advertisers to target ads and/or content at them.
If Internet users are so concerned about their privacy, do they read the terms of service (TOS)?
66% either just click the agree box without reading any of the TOS, or skim through the TOS then click agree.
Only 17% carefully read the TOS before agreeing.
More college grads (27%) than non-college grads (18%) just click agree without reading.
The way I see it, more people need to read the TOS before signing up for these sites so they understand what kinds of data they’re giving to these platforms. Stronger privacy laws could be useful too.
Folks, are you concerned about your online privacy? And if so, what are you doing about it?
Hey folks, real important stuff: almost 50% of Americans under the age of 35 have been bullied, harassed or threatened online, or know someone who has, according to a new poll published today.
You may not be surprised to discover that women are targeted more often than men, and Facebook’s by far the most common forum for harassment.
The poll, released by Rad Campaign, Lincoln Park Strategies and myself, shows that harassment’s a problem across populations, affecting 25% of all Americans. And when looking at folks under 35, the number shoots up to 47%. Rad Campaign’s taken the data and broken it up into an infographic.
Here’s some important findings from the poll:
Women report being personally harassed much more frequently than men – the gender gap’s 57% women to 43% men across all age groups.
Sexual harassment’s the most common form of harassment – 44% of all incidences), followed by:
Slurs on a person’s professional ability (28%),
and Political (16%) insults.
Surprisingly, the level of sexual harassment’s virtually identical between men (44%) and women (43%).
62% of respondents who said they’d been harassed online said it happened on Facebook. And, Twitter came in second at 24%.
The poll found significant effects of the harassment, including people who said they were scared for their life (29% of those harassed) and were afraid to leave their house (20%).
More than 2/3 of those harassed online said they knew their harasser in real life. And in those under 35 , that number rose to 72%.
“Some people may think the Internet is a place where they can threaten people without consequences, but online harassment has horrifying real-life effects,” said Allyson Kapin, co-founder of Rad Campaign.
“These poll results show the need for effective responses to the problem at all levels.”
Strangely enough, the poll shows that in only 25% of cases users reported harassment to the social networks where it happened, yet the social networks themselves appear to react when called upon– in 61% of cases, according to the poll, the network shut down the offender’s account.
“The high levels of harassment reported by those under 35, show that this problem will likely continue to grow out of control if not addressed,” said Stefan Hankin, President of Lincoln Park Strategies. “The results from this poll, especially surrounding the long reaction times to reported cases of harassment, point to a need for the social media sites, law enforcement, and us as individuals to start taking this issue more seriously.”
And I agree, the first step toward dealing with unacceptable behavior, understand the problem, then we can get rid of it.
To view the rest of the findings, visit: www.OnlineHarassmentData.org. The data and some solutions to the problem will also be discussed at the Personal Democracy Forum panel: Sex, Lies, and the Internet, beginning at 2pm ET on Thursday, June 6 with Allyson Kapin.
What works for you to stop online harassment, bullying, and threats? More to come…
These results are based on a survey of 1,007 Americans over 18 conducted online from May 20-22, 2014. Margin of error is approximately ±3.09% at the 95% confidence level.
Hey, I’m always excited about technology for social good. My motto for craigconnects is using technology to give the voiceless a real voice, and the powerless real power. Recently, I invested in GreatNonprofits.org to create a Yelp for nonprofits. I asked Perla Ni, of GreatNonprofits to write a guest blog post about this investment I’ve made.
Craig Newmark funds API to build user-generated nonprofit reviews into software
GreatNonprofits.org has a robust website with over 170,000 peer-to-peer reviews on over 16,000 nonprofits. GreatNonprofits.org is now building an API to embed these reviews into grants management and employee giving software and other programs so funders and grant makers can look holistically at their portfolios – incorporating the quantitative and qualitative data into decision making. To start, GreatNonprofits.org is partnering with Fluxx – a new grant management software with a lofty goal of bringing all donor management data into one place for better decision-making.
Collaboration, Bi-Directional Knowledge Sharing and Beneficiary Feedback
With more and more CRM tools (like Salesforce) in the market, talk of collaboration and data sharing is rampant. Organizations are increasingly working with more data and more people—hence, the need for better tools. This is especially true in the nonprofit sector where grant makers have many data points to manage and consider—from financial to program data and even beneficiary feedback.
While, as humans we are always well intentioned to gather various data points while formulating decisions, the harder it is to gather and analyze this data the less likely we are to incorporate it fully into our analysis. Sadly, this is often the case when it comes to beneficiary feedback in the nonprofit sector. Well, that is about to change with this recent investment.
A New API; A Whole New World
GreatNonprofits – now the largest nonprofit review site of its kind – is building a write-a-review API. This new API will allow third party partners to integrate reviews into their systems in a seamless and automated fashion. One of GreatNonprofits first software partners is Fluxx—an innovative grants management CRM system that allows foundation officers and executive staff to easily make decisions by housing all pertinent data in one place.
“We’re trying to push all information to the program manager in one place. And once that data is available to the program manager, he or she can pivot on the view,” says Jason Ricci, CEO of Fluxx.
So whether you’re at a foundation and need to check the 501(c)3 status prior to writing a check or if you want to understand other charities that fellow foundations have donated to, you can do this all in one place.
The partnership between Fluxx and GreatNonprofits is one of the first of its kind to bring this bi-directional data together in one place. And this is key, because in all the data mining, some times the stories of the beneficiaries served gets lost. But with over 170,000 reviews and growing, plus this new API functionality — these stories will be made available to foundations and corporations all in one place. And this benefits not only the foundation or corporation who is trying to analyze the impact of the investment beyond financial metrics, but also to the nonprofit who needs a little help in demonstrating their impact to the world.
“What I love about GreatNonprofits,” says Ricci, “is that they’re collecting actual reviews from people in the field who know an organization’s work well—and those reviews are starting to tell stories about that organization’s work. So from a grant maker’s perspective, they’re not just looking at an organization’s financials to make decisions on whether to fund them, but they’re looking at real reviews from real people.”
So What’s next?
This is the first of many ventures for Great Nonprofits to extend over 170,000 nonprofit reviews to other sectors. Along with this, GreatNonprofits is looking to partner with employee engagement software providers, so employees of corporations can read and write reviews about the impact they are having on nonprofits, and the corporation can easily collect these stories of impact to marry with other information about their charitable giving programs.
Toward this goal, GreatNonprofits is also in discussion with Benevity, (www.benevity.com), a software social enterprise. Benevity’s award winning employee giving and volunteering solution, Spark!, is used by some of the most notable companies in the world to engage employees around causes. Benevity has committed to embed the GreatNonprofits.org API into its platform to help inspire and inform giving decisions for its end users. The soon to launch partnership with Benevity will help its clients engage their employees and add more information and interaction to their giving activities.
While we wait… (back to Craig)
As an investor, I think it’s really important for the next advancement in the nonprofit sector to bring reviews and crowd-sourced information about beneficiary feedback directly to donors, foundations, and nonprofits.